<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scanners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://webphototraders.com/digital/dossier/scanners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://webphototraders.com/digital/dossier/scanners/</link>
	<description>making digital photography kids play</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:59:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Davis</title>
		<link>http://webphototraders.com/digital/dossier/scanners/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://webphototraders.com/digital/dossier/scanners/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>When it comes to film (slides/negs/transparencies) a drum scanner is the only choice when you want to capture every bit of the original detail. 

Often the results can be surprisingly superior, in terms of color and detail, to even very expensive DSLR digital camera shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to film (slides/negs/transparencies) a drum scanner is the only choice when you want to capture every bit of the original detail. </p>
<p>Often the results can be surprisingly superior, in terms of color and detail, to even very expensive DSLR digital camera shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
